Review



biotinylated egfr antibodies  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems biotinylated egfr antibodies
    Figure 2. EVPio assay optimization for inner protein detection. (A) Illustration of the need for an AR step. (i) The inner proteins of captured EVs are bound by the lipid bilayer membrane and inaccessible to antibodies. (ii) Fixation cross-links inner proteins, while permeabilization allows antibodies to diffuse into EVs, but methylene cross-linking limits the accessibility to epitopes. Permeabilization can be used to allow antibodies to breach the membrane while keeping cytosolic proteins in place, but cross-links can limit the epitope accessibility. (iii) Heat-based AR treatment of EVs induces partial hydrolytic breakage of cross-links, allowing antibody binding of retained and immobilized proteins. (B) AR optimization experiments with different buffers/additives, temperatures and incubation times, and fluorescence detection signal for inner protein HSP90 and outer protein <t>EGFR,</t> with superposed heatmap. The red rectangle indicates the optimal condition that was chosen based on high HSP90 and high EGFR signals. Signal values are above the threshold of NC + 2SD unless grayed. A zero value indicates a negative or zero difference between the signal and its associated no EV control. (C) Fluorescence micrograph of the optimal AR condition: 1 min at 90 °C, in PBS. (D) Bar graph of HSP90 detection signal on spots with CD63 capture antibody and negative control spots with GAM antibody serving as NC. The threshold of NC + 2SD is illustrated as a horizontal line.
    Biotinylated Egfr Antibodies, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 14 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated egfr antibodies/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 14 article reviews
    biotinylated egfr antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Extracellular Vesicle Antibody Microarray for Multiplexed Inner and Outer Protein Analysis."

    Article Title: Extracellular Vesicle Antibody Microarray for Multiplexed Inner and Outer Protein Analysis.

    Journal: ACS sensors

    doi: 10.1021/acssensors.2c01750

    Figure 2. EVPio assay optimization for inner protein detection. (A) Illustration of the need for an AR step. (i) The inner proteins of captured EVs are bound by the lipid bilayer membrane and inaccessible to antibodies. (ii) Fixation cross-links inner proteins, while permeabilization allows antibodies to diffuse into EVs, but methylene cross-linking limits the accessibility to epitopes. Permeabilization can be used to allow antibodies to breach the membrane while keeping cytosolic proteins in place, but cross-links can limit the epitope accessibility. (iii) Heat-based AR treatment of EVs induces partial hydrolytic breakage of cross-links, allowing antibody binding of retained and immobilized proteins. (B) AR optimization experiments with different buffers/additives, temperatures and incubation times, and fluorescence detection signal for inner protein HSP90 and outer protein EGFR, with superposed heatmap. The red rectangle indicates the optimal condition that was chosen based on high HSP90 and high EGFR signals. Signal values are above the threshold of NC + 2SD unless grayed. A zero value indicates a negative or zero difference between the signal and its associated no EV control. (C) Fluorescence micrograph of the optimal AR condition: 1 min at 90 °C, in PBS. (D) Bar graph of HSP90 detection signal on spots with CD63 capture antibody and negative control spots with GAM antibody serving as NC. The threshold of NC + 2SD is illustrated as a horizontal line.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 2. EVPio assay optimization for inner protein detection. (A) Illustration of the need for an AR step. (i) The inner proteins of captured EVs are bound by the lipid bilayer membrane and inaccessible to antibodies. (ii) Fixation cross-links inner proteins, while permeabilization allows antibodies to diffuse into EVs, but methylene cross-linking limits the accessibility to epitopes. Permeabilization can be used to allow antibodies to breach the membrane while keeping cytosolic proteins in place, but cross-links can limit the epitope accessibility. (iii) Heat-based AR treatment of EVs induces partial hydrolytic breakage of cross-links, allowing antibody binding of retained and immobilized proteins. (B) AR optimization experiments with different buffers/additives, temperatures and incubation times, and fluorescence detection signal for inner protein HSP90 and outer protein EGFR, with superposed heatmap. The red rectangle indicates the optimal condition that was chosen based on high HSP90 and high EGFR signals. Signal values are above the threshold of NC + 2SD unless grayed. A zero value indicates a negative or zero difference between the signal and its associated no EV control. (C) Fluorescence micrograph of the optimal AR condition: 1 min at 90 °C, in PBS. (D) Bar graph of HSP90 detection signal on spots with CD63 capture antibody and negative control spots with GAM antibody serving as NC. The threshold of NC + 2SD is illustrated as a horizontal line.

    Techniques Used: Membrane, Binding Assay, Incubation, Fluorescence, Control, Negative Control



    Similar Products

    93
    R&D Systems biotinylated egfr antibodies
    Figure 2. EVPio assay optimization for inner protein detection. (A) Illustration of the need for an AR step. (i) The inner proteins of captured EVs are bound by the lipid bilayer membrane and inaccessible to antibodies. (ii) Fixation cross-links inner proteins, while permeabilization allows antibodies to diffuse into EVs, but methylene cross-linking limits the accessibility to epitopes. Permeabilization can be used to allow antibodies to breach the membrane while keeping cytosolic proteins in place, but cross-links can limit the epitope accessibility. (iii) Heat-based AR treatment of EVs induces partial hydrolytic breakage of cross-links, allowing antibody binding of retained and immobilized proteins. (B) AR optimization experiments with different buffers/additives, temperatures and incubation times, and fluorescence detection signal for inner protein HSP90 and outer protein <t>EGFR,</t> with superposed heatmap. The red rectangle indicates the optimal condition that was chosen based on high HSP90 and high EGFR signals. Signal values are above the threshold of NC + 2SD unless grayed. A zero value indicates a negative or zero difference between the signal and its associated no EV control. (C) Fluorescence micrograph of the optimal AR condition: 1 min at 90 °C, in PBS. (D) Bar graph of HSP90 detection signal on spots with CD63 capture antibody and negative control spots with GAM antibody serving as NC. The threshold of NC + 2SD is illustrated as a horizontal line.
    Biotinylated Egfr Antibodies, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated egfr antibodies/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    biotinylated egfr antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    R&D Systems biotinylated anti human egfr
    Figure 2. EVPio assay optimization for inner protein detection. (A) Illustration of the need for an AR step. (i) The inner proteins of captured EVs are bound by the lipid bilayer membrane and inaccessible to antibodies. (ii) Fixation cross-links inner proteins, while permeabilization allows antibodies to diffuse into EVs, but methylene cross-linking limits the accessibility to epitopes. Permeabilization can be used to allow antibodies to breach the membrane while keeping cytosolic proteins in place, but cross-links can limit the epitope accessibility. (iii) Heat-based AR treatment of EVs induces partial hydrolytic breakage of cross-links, allowing antibody binding of retained and immobilized proteins. (B) AR optimization experiments with different buffers/additives, temperatures and incubation times, and fluorescence detection signal for inner protein HSP90 and outer protein <t>EGFR,</t> with superposed heatmap. The red rectangle indicates the optimal condition that was chosen based on high HSP90 and high EGFR signals. Signal values are above the threshold of NC + 2SD unless grayed. A zero value indicates a negative or zero difference between the signal and its associated no EV control. (C) Fluorescence micrograph of the optimal AR condition: 1 min at 90 °C, in PBS. (D) Bar graph of HSP90 detection signal on spots with CD63 capture antibody and negative control spots with GAM antibody serving as NC. The threshold of NC + 2SD is illustrated as a horizontal line.
    Biotinylated Anti Human Egfr, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated anti human egfr/product/R&D Systems
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    biotinylated anti human egfr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    R&D Systems goat anti human il13rα2
    ( A ) Freshly dispersed viable patient brain tumor (PBT) GBM cells (gated as DAPI-, CD45-, CD31-) were immunostained for expression of <t>IL13Rα2,</t> HER2, EGFR, or binding by Cy5.5-conjugated CLTX. Percentages of stained cells (blue) compared to control staining (grey) are indicated in each histogram. ( B ) Summary of staining results (% positive as in (A)) for 22 primary PBTs ( left ) or 18 PBT tumor spheres (TS) ( right ). ND, not done. ( C ) Representative phenotype of a GBM xenograft established by stereotactic injection of 1 x 10 5 PBT106 TS cells into the right forebrain of an NSG mouse. Tumor-bearing mouse brain was harvested 97 days after cell injection, and paraffin sections were stained with antibodies against IL13Rα2, EGFR, and biotin-conjugated CLTX. Staining was visualized by fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody staining and DAPI to identify nuclei. Scale bars: 20μM. ( D ) Freshly-dispersed GBM samples separated into CD44+ and CD44- ( left ) or CD133+ and CD133- ( right ) subpopulations were examined for differences in CLTX-Cy5.5 staining, measured as mean fluorescence intensities (MFI). Only primary PBT samples with >20% of CD44+ or CD133+ fractions were analyzed. ( E ) PBT-TS lines, maintained in neural stem cell medium (TS) or differentiation medium (Dif) for 14 days, were evaluated for CLTX-Cy5.5 and CD133 staining (MFI). ( D, E ) p values are indicated using paired two-way Student’s t-test.
    Goat Anti Human Il13rα2, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/goat anti human il13rα2/product/R&D Systems
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    goat anti human il13rα2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems baf154 baf358 baf231
    ( A ) Freshly dispersed viable patient brain tumor (PBT) GBM cells (gated as DAPI-, CD45-, CD31-) were immunostained for expression of <t>IL13Rα2,</t> HER2, EGFR, or binding by Cy5.5-conjugated CLTX. Percentages of stained cells (blue) compared to control staining (grey) are indicated in each histogram. ( B ) Summary of staining results (% positive as in (A)) for 22 primary PBTs ( left ) or 18 PBT tumor spheres (TS) ( right ). ND, not done. ( C ) Representative phenotype of a GBM xenograft established by stereotactic injection of 1 x 10 5 PBT106 TS cells into the right forebrain of an NSG mouse. Tumor-bearing mouse brain was harvested 97 days after cell injection, and paraffin sections were stained with antibodies against IL13Rα2, EGFR, and biotin-conjugated CLTX. Staining was visualized by fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody staining and DAPI to identify nuclei. Scale bars: 20μM. ( D ) Freshly-dispersed GBM samples separated into CD44+ and CD44- ( left ) or CD133+ and CD133- ( right ) subpopulations were examined for differences in CLTX-Cy5.5 staining, measured as mean fluorescence intensities (MFI). Only primary PBT samples with >20% of CD44+ or CD133+ fractions were analyzed. ( E ) PBT-TS lines, maintained in neural stem cell medium (TS) or differentiation medium (Dif) for 14 days, were evaluated for CLTX-Cy5.5 and CD133 staining (MFI). ( D, E ) p values are indicated using paired two-way Student’s t-test.
    Baf154 Baf358 Baf231, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/baf154 baf358 baf231/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    baf154 baf358 baf231 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems biotinylated egfr
    ( A ) Freshly dispersed viable patient brain tumor (PBT) GBM cells (gated as DAPI-, CD45-, CD31-) were immunostained for expression of <t>IL13Rα2,</t> HER2, EGFR, or binding by Cy5.5-conjugated CLTX. Percentages of stained cells (blue) compared to control staining (grey) are indicated in each histogram. ( B ) Summary of staining results (% positive as in (A)) for 22 primary PBTs ( left ) or 18 PBT tumor spheres (TS) ( right ). ND, not done. ( C ) Representative phenotype of a GBM xenograft established by stereotactic injection of 1 x 10 5 PBT106 TS cells into the right forebrain of an NSG mouse. Tumor-bearing mouse brain was harvested 97 days after cell injection, and paraffin sections were stained with antibodies against IL13Rα2, EGFR, and biotin-conjugated CLTX. Staining was visualized by fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody staining and DAPI to identify nuclei. Scale bars: 20μM. ( D ) Freshly-dispersed GBM samples separated into CD44+ and CD44- ( left ) or CD133+ and CD133- ( right ) subpopulations were examined for differences in CLTX-Cy5.5 staining, measured as mean fluorescence intensities (MFI). Only primary PBT samples with >20% of CD44+ or CD133+ fractions were analyzed. ( E ) PBT-TS lines, maintained in neural stem cell medium (TS) or differentiation medium (Dif) for 14 days, were evaluated for CLTX-Cy5.5 and CD133 staining (MFI). ( D, E ) p values are indicated using paired two-way Student’s t-test.
    Biotinylated Egfr, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/biotinylated egfr/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    biotinylated egfr - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    92
    R&D Systems human egfr biotinylated antibody
    ( A ) Freshly dispersed viable patient brain tumor (PBT) GBM cells (gated as DAPI-, CD45-, CD31-) were immunostained for expression of <t>IL13Rα2,</t> HER2, EGFR, or binding by Cy5.5-conjugated CLTX. Percentages of stained cells (blue) compared to control staining (grey) are indicated in each histogram. ( B ) Summary of staining results (% positive as in (A)) for 22 primary PBTs ( left ) or 18 PBT tumor spheres (TS) ( right ). ND, not done. ( C ) Representative phenotype of a GBM xenograft established by stereotactic injection of 1 x 10 5 PBT106 TS cells into the right forebrain of an NSG mouse. Tumor-bearing mouse brain was harvested 97 days after cell injection, and paraffin sections were stained with antibodies against IL13Rα2, EGFR, and biotin-conjugated CLTX. Staining was visualized by fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody staining and DAPI to identify nuclei. Scale bars: 20μM. ( D ) Freshly-dispersed GBM samples separated into CD44+ and CD44- ( left ) or CD133+ and CD133- ( right ) subpopulations were examined for differences in CLTX-Cy5.5 staining, measured as mean fluorescence intensities (MFI). Only primary PBT samples with >20% of CD44+ or CD133+ fractions were analyzed. ( E ) PBT-TS lines, maintained in neural stem cell medium (TS) or differentiation medium (Dif) for 14 days, were evaluated for CLTX-Cy5.5 and CD133 staining (MFI). ( D, E ) p values are indicated using paired two-way Student’s t-test.
    Human Egfr Biotinylated Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human egfr biotinylated antibody/product/R&D Systems
    Average 92 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human egfr biotinylated antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    92/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems baf231
    ( A ) Freshly dispersed viable patient brain tumor (PBT) GBM cells (gated as DAPI-, CD45-, CD31-) were immunostained for expression of <t>IL13Rα2,</t> HER2, EGFR, or binding by Cy5.5-conjugated CLTX. Percentages of stained cells (blue) compared to control staining (grey) are indicated in each histogram. ( B ) Summary of staining results (% positive as in (A)) for 22 primary PBTs ( left ) or 18 PBT tumor spheres (TS) ( right ). ND, not done. ( C ) Representative phenotype of a GBM xenograft established by stereotactic injection of 1 x 10 5 PBT106 TS cells into the right forebrain of an NSG mouse. Tumor-bearing mouse brain was harvested 97 days after cell injection, and paraffin sections were stained with antibodies against IL13Rα2, EGFR, and biotin-conjugated CLTX. Staining was visualized by fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody staining and DAPI to identify nuclei. Scale bars: 20μM. ( D ) Freshly-dispersed GBM samples separated into CD44+ and CD44- ( left ) or CD133+ and CD133- ( right ) subpopulations were examined for differences in CLTX-Cy5.5 staining, measured as mean fluorescence intensities (MFI). Only primary PBT samples with >20% of CD44+ or CD133+ fractions were analyzed. ( E ) PBT-TS lines, maintained in neural stem cell medium (TS) or differentiation medium (Dif) for 14 days, were evaluated for CLTX-Cy5.5 and CD133 staining (MFI). ( D, E ) p values are indicated using paired two-way Student’s t-test.
    Baf231, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/baf231/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    baf231 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Figure 2. EVPio assay optimization for inner protein detection. (A) Illustration of the need for an AR step. (i) The inner proteins of captured EVs are bound by the lipid bilayer membrane and inaccessible to antibodies. (ii) Fixation cross-links inner proteins, while permeabilization allows antibodies to diffuse into EVs, but methylene cross-linking limits the accessibility to epitopes. Permeabilization can be used to allow antibodies to breach the membrane while keeping cytosolic proteins in place, but cross-links can limit the epitope accessibility. (iii) Heat-based AR treatment of EVs induces partial hydrolytic breakage of cross-links, allowing antibody binding of retained and immobilized proteins. (B) AR optimization experiments with different buffers/additives, temperatures and incubation times, and fluorescence detection signal for inner protein HSP90 and outer protein EGFR, with superposed heatmap. The red rectangle indicates the optimal condition that was chosen based on high HSP90 and high EGFR signals. Signal values are above the threshold of NC + 2SD unless grayed. A zero value indicates a negative or zero difference between the signal and its associated no EV control. (C) Fluorescence micrograph of the optimal AR condition: 1 min at 90 °C, in PBS. (D) Bar graph of HSP90 detection signal on spots with CD63 capture antibody and negative control spots with GAM antibody serving as NC. The threshold of NC + 2SD is illustrated as a horizontal line.

    Journal: ACS sensors

    Article Title: Extracellular Vesicle Antibody Microarray for Multiplexed Inner and Outer Protein Analysis.

    doi: 10.1021/acssensors.2c01750

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. EVPio assay optimization for inner protein detection. (A) Illustration of the need for an AR step. (i) The inner proteins of captured EVs are bound by the lipid bilayer membrane and inaccessible to antibodies. (ii) Fixation cross-links inner proteins, while permeabilization allows antibodies to diffuse into EVs, but methylene cross-linking limits the accessibility to epitopes. Permeabilization can be used to allow antibodies to breach the membrane while keeping cytosolic proteins in place, but cross-links can limit the epitope accessibility. (iii) Heat-based AR treatment of EVs induces partial hydrolytic breakage of cross-links, allowing antibody binding of retained and immobilized proteins. (B) AR optimization experiments with different buffers/additives, temperatures and incubation times, and fluorescence detection signal for inner protein HSP90 and outer protein EGFR, with superposed heatmap. The red rectangle indicates the optimal condition that was chosen based on high HSP90 and high EGFR signals. Signal values are above the threshold of NC + 2SD unless grayed. A zero value indicates a negative or zero difference between the signal and its associated no EV control. (C) Fluorescence micrograph of the optimal AR condition: 1 min at 90 °C, in PBS. (D) Bar graph of HSP90 detection signal on spots with CD63 capture antibody and negative control spots with GAM antibody serving as NC. The threshold of NC + 2SD is illustrated as a horizontal line.

    Article Snippet: 2022, 7, 3817−3828 3825 Invitrogen), and biotinylated EGFR antibodies (BAF231, R&D Systems) were used at the detection step at concentrations of 5, 5, and 1 μg/mL, respectively, followed by labeling with Alexa Fluor 647- conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies (A-21245, Invitrogen) and streptavidin (S21374, Invitrogen).

    Techniques: Membrane, Binding Assay, Incubation, Fluorescence, Control, Negative Control

    ( A ) Freshly dispersed viable patient brain tumor (PBT) GBM cells (gated as DAPI-, CD45-, CD31-) were immunostained for expression of IL13Rα2, HER2, EGFR, or binding by Cy5.5-conjugated CLTX. Percentages of stained cells (blue) compared to control staining (grey) are indicated in each histogram. ( B ) Summary of staining results (% positive as in (A)) for 22 primary PBTs ( left ) or 18 PBT tumor spheres (TS) ( right ). ND, not done. ( C ) Representative phenotype of a GBM xenograft established by stereotactic injection of 1 x 10 5 PBT106 TS cells into the right forebrain of an NSG mouse. Tumor-bearing mouse brain was harvested 97 days after cell injection, and paraffin sections were stained with antibodies against IL13Rα2, EGFR, and biotin-conjugated CLTX. Staining was visualized by fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody staining and DAPI to identify nuclei. Scale bars: 20μM. ( D ) Freshly-dispersed GBM samples separated into CD44+ and CD44- ( left ) or CD133+ and CD133- ( right ) subpopulations were examined for differences in CLTX-Cy5.5 staining, measured as mean fluorescence intensities (MFI). Only primary PBT samples with >20% of CD44+ or CD133+ fractions were analyzed. ( E ) PBT-TS lines, maintained in neural stem cell medium (TS) or differentiation medium (Dif) for 14 days, were evaluated for CLTX-Cy5.5 and CD133 staining (MFI). ( D, E ) p values are indicated using paired two-way Student’s t-test.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Chlorotoxin Redirects Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Specific and Effective Targeting of Glioblastoma

    doi: 10.1101/2020.01.24.918888

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Freshly dispersed viable patient brain tumor (PBT) GBM cells (gated as DAPI-, CD45-, CD31-) were immunostained for expression of IL13Rα2, HER2, EGFR, or binding by Cy5.5-conjugated CLTX. Percentages of stained cells (blue) compared to control staining (grey) are indicated in each histogram. ( B ) Summary of staining results (% positive as in (A)) for 22 primary PBTs ( left ) or 18 PBT tumor spheres (TS) ( right ). ND, not done. ( C ) Representative phenotype of a GBM xenograft established by stereotactic injection of 1 x 10 5 PBT106 TS cells into the right forebrain of an NSG mouse. Tumor-bearing mouse brain was harvested 97 days after cell injection, and paraffin sections were stained with antibodies against IL13Rα2, EGFR, and biotin-conjugated CLTX. Staining was visualized by fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibody staining and DAPI to identify nuclei. Scale bars: 20μM. ( D ) Freshly-dispersed GBM samples separated into CD44+ and CD44- ( left ) or CD133+ and CD133- ( right ) subpopulations were examined for differences in CLTX-Cy5.5 staining, measured as mean fluorescence intensities (MFI). Only primary PBT samples with >20% of CD44+ or CD133+ fractions were analyzed. ( E ) PBT-TS lines, maintained in neural stem cell medium (TS) or differentiation medium (Dif) for 14 days, were evaluated for CLTX-Cy5.5 and CD133 staining (MFI). ( D, E ) p values are indicated using paired two-way Student’s t-test.

    Article Snippet: IF staining was performed on paraffin sections using the procedures of a previous study , with the following antibodies: goat-anti-human IL13Rα2 (R&D systems, polyclonal), mouse-anti-human EGFR (Dako, DAK-H1-WT), and CLTX-biotin.

    Techniques: Expressing, Binding Assay, Staining, Injection, Fluorescence

    ( A ) Diagram of a CAR containing a tumor targeting CLTX domain, an IgG4-Fc spacer domain with EQ mutations, a CD4 transmembrane domain, and intracellular signaling domains (CD28 and CD3ζ). ( B ) Immunological synapse formation at 2h after adding CLTX-CAR T cells to GBM cells dissociated from PBT003-4-TS (IL13Rα2-) or PBT106-TS (IL13Rα2+) (E:T=1:1). Top , a representative image of immunological synapse indicated by co-localization of phosphorylated-CD3ζ (p-CD3ζ) and polarized F-actin accumulation at the interface between the CLTX-EQ-28ζ CAR T cell and the tumor cell. Arrowhead: T cell; scale bars: 5 μM. Bottom , Number of immunological-synapses per 5,000 tumor nuclei, when mock-transduced T cells, CLTX-CAR T cells, or IL13Rα2-CAR T cells, were co-cultured with different GBM cells. Five different fields were counted for each group. Mean±SEM is plotted; ***, p<0.001. ( C ) Degranulation of CLTX-CAR T cells (% CD107a) after co-culture with GBM cells from different PBT-TS lines. Mock-transduced T cells, CLTX-CAR T cells or IL13Rα2-CAR T cells were stimulated with either IL13Rα2-negative (PBT003-4, PBT138) or IL13Rα2+ (PBT030-2, PBT106) GBM cells at a 1:1 E:T ratio for 5h, and CD3/CD19t+ gated cells were analyzed for surface CD107a expression as a marker of degranulation. Mean ± S.E.M of % CD107a+ cells in duplicate wells are depicted. ( D ) GBM cells were co-cultured with mock T cells, CLTX-CAR T cells or IL13Rα2-CAR T cells at an effector:target (E:T) ratio of 1:4 for 48 h. CAR T cell activity is shown by the percentage of target cells eliminated. ( C, D ) *, p <0.05; **, p <0.01; ***, p <0.001 compared with mock T cells using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Tests. All PBT numbers indicate PBT-TS lines.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Chlorotoxin Redirects Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Specific and Effective Targeting of Glioblastoma

    doi: 10.1101/2020.01.24.918888

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Diagram of a CAR containing a tumor targeting CLTX domain, an IgG4-Fc spacer domain with EQ mutations, a CD4 transmembrane domain, and intracellular signaling domains (CD28 and CD3ζ). ( B ) Immunological synapse formation at 2h after adding CLTX-CAR T cells to GBM cells dissociated from PBT003-4-TS (IL13Rα2-) or PBT106-TS (IL13Rα2+) (E:T=1:1). Top , a representative image of immunological synapse indicated by co-localization of phosphorylated-CD3ζ (p-CD3ζ) and polarized F-actin accumulation at the interface between the CLTX-EQ-28ζ CAR T cell and the tumor cell. Arrowhead: T cell; scale bars: 5 μM. Bottom , Number of immunological-synapses per 5,000 tumor nuclei, when mock-transduced T cells, CLTX-CAR T cells, or IL13Rα2-CAR T cells, were co-cultured with different GBM cells. Five different fields were counted for each group. Mean±SEM is plotted; ***, p<0.001. ( C ) Degranulation of CLTX-CAR T cells (% CD107a) after co-culture with GBM cells from different PBT-TS lines. Mock-transduced T cells, CLTX-CAR T cells or IL13Rα2-CAR T cells were stimulated with either IL13Rα2-negative (PBT003-4, PBT138) or IL13Rα2+ (PBT030-2, PBT106) GBM cells at a 1:1 E:T ratio for 5h, and CD3/CD19t+ gated cells were analyzed for surface CD107a expression as a marker of degranulation. Mean ± S.E.M of % CD107a+ cells in duplicate wells are depicted. ( D ) GBM cells were co-cultured with mock T cells, CLTX-CAR T cells or IL13Rα2-CAR T cells at an effector:target (E:T) ratio of 1:4 for 48 h. CAR T cell activity is shown by the percentage of target cells eliminated. ( C, D ) *, p <0.05; **, p <0.01; ***, p <0.001 compared with mock T cells using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s Multiple Comparison Tests. All PBT numbers indicate PBT-TS lines.

    Article Snippet: IF staining was performed on paraffin sections using the procedures of a previous study , with the following antibodies: goat-anti-human IL13Rα2 (R&D systems, polyclonal), mouse-anti-human EGFR (Dako, DAK-H1-WT), and CLTX-biotin.

    Techniques: Cell Culture, Co-Culture Assay, Expressing, Marker, Activity Assay, Comparison